Our data center responded to your question, here is the text:
We can confirm that the new netblock is routed direct via your vlan as with
your original netblock
VLAN: vlan655-cbcbmedi-809, Created at: Mon Oct 20 13:42:05 2014
802.1Q Tag: 655, Internal index: 205, Admin State: Enabled, Origin: Static
Layer 3 interface: vlan.655 (UP)
IPV4 addresses:
60.34.75.209/28
79.112.227.33/27
Protocol: Port Mode, Mac aging time: 300 seconds
Number of interfaces: Tagged 0 (Active = 0), Untagged 1 (Active = 1)
ge-5/0/20.0*, untagged, access
On 6/19/2015 9:01 AM, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote:
Dnia piątek, 19 czerwca 2015 00:10:01 Chuck @ Mantis pisze:
I'm currently using FreeBSD and PF as a gateway and firewall in front of
a handful of web servers.
External:
defaultrouter="79.112.227.33"
ifconfig_bge0="inet 79.112.227.34 netmask 255.255.255.224"
I've asked the datacenter for an additional block and received:
Gateway : 60.34.75.209
IP block : 60.34.75.208/28
Subnet : 255.255.255.240
Since the gateways are different, I'm assuming I need to use PF or BSD
to somehow direct (route?) traffic which came via the new block out
through the new gateway?
Are both subnets on-link or done by real routing? Of on-link and if both are
on the same router and vlan from your provider, then it is going to work fine
while using only one gateway.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
