On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Paul Webster <paul.g.webs...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Good day all, > > I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, I > believe the final decision was that to many users are used to the old > style pf and an upgrade to the new syntax would cause to much confusion. > > There was a recent debate on ##freebsd about this issue and I was inclined > to mail in and get your opinions; basically it boiled down to the majority > of users wanting either: > > 1) To move to the newer pf and just add to releases notes what had > happened, > and > 2) my own personal opinion: creating 'pf2-*' as a kernel option tree, > basically using the newer pf syntax and allowing users to choose. > > I would be interested to know the feedback from you guys as to be honest > there seems to be quite a few users who actually DO want the new style > format and functionality that comes with.
My vote is for option 1, but I'll also be happy with option 2 if it costs little to maintain both versions. I'm pretty much for anything that brings pf in sync (or close to it) with OpenBSD. - Max _______________________________________________ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
