Dude that was great it worked, I only changed the modulate to keep to work.

Thanks

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Damien Fleuriot <m...@my.gd> wrote:

> Regarding your rule #12, I confirm it is matched, and you have seen it
> yourself: the bytes and states values change.
> 
> 
> Regarding modulate state, you can find the manual entry for OpenBSD's
> page which states that:
> ===
> The modulate state option works just like keep state except that it only
> applies to TCP packets. With modulate state, the Initial Sequence Number
> (ISN) of outgoing connections is randomized. This is useful for
> protecting connections initiated by certain operating systems that do a
> poor job of choosing ISNs. To allow simpler rulesets, the modulate state
> option can be used in rules that specify protocols other than TCP; in
> those cases, it is treated as keep state.
> ===
> 
> 
> In a nutshell, it randomizes Initial Sequence Numbers for TCP to provide
> better protection against certain specific attacks.
> 
> 
> As an initial test, I would like you to adjust your rule to use "keep
> state" instead of "modulate state" and try again.
> 
> 
> If that should fail as well, we'll get back to the scrub bit.
> In the meantime you can read about it here:
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ru/scrub.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2/28/12 3:43 PM, csbender wrote:
>> Hi  Damien, PF folks
>> yes 
>> checking the pflog is  important. I am not entirely sure but please correct 
>> were 
>> I go off path.
>> 
>> I send SMTP traffic from client here is pflog:
>> 
>> # tcpdump -nei pflog0 host 10.156.81.10 and port 25 
>> tcpdump: listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG
>> 09:37:14.901238 rule 12/(match) pass in on bge0: 10.156.81.10.55718 > 
>> 172.19.4.41.25: S 3029008357:3029008357(0) win 64240 <mss 
>> 1260,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,[|tcp]> (DF) [tos 0xb8]
>> 09:37:14.901276 rule 12/(match) pass out on vlan579: 10.156.81.10.55718 > 
>> 172.19.4.41.25: S 3597046675:3597046675(0) win 64240 <mss 
>> 1260,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,[|tcp]> [tos 0xb8]
>> 09:37:35.901429 rule 12/(match) pass in on bge0: 10.156.81.10.55718 > 
>> 172.19.4.41.25: S 3029008357:3029008357(0) win 64240 <mss 
>> 1260,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,[|tcp]> (DF) [tos 0xb8]
>> 09:37:35.901471 rule 12/(match) pass out on vlan579: 10.156.81.10.55718 > 
>> 172.19.4.41.25: S 3619107731:3619107731(0) win 64240 <mss 
>> 1260,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,[|tcp]> [tos 0xb8]
>> 
>> 
>> Now I am not sure what indicated this rules is used. From below
>> 
>> @11 pass in quick inet proto tcp from 172.19.4.75 to 172.19.5.1 port = ssh 
>> flags 
>> any modulate state label "RULE -1 -- ACCEPT "
>>  [ Evaluations: 0         Packets: 0         Bytes: 0           States: 0    
>>  ]
>>  [ Inserted: uid 0 pid 1901 State Creations: 0     ]
>> @12 pass log quick inet proto tcp from <tbl.r0.s:22> to <tbl.r0.d:4> port = 
>> smtp 
>> flags any modulate state label "RULE 0 -- ACCEPT "
>>  [ Evaluations: 111973184  Packets: 12400     Bytes: 893938      States: 6   
>>   
>> ]
>> 
>> you have packets, byes and states. Is it the state I must see incrementing? 
>> I 
>> have doen this several times and I see the state incrementing.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> @11 pass in quick inet proto tcp from 172.19.4.75 to 172.19.5.1 port = ssh 
>> flags 
>> any modulate state label "RULE -1 -- ACCEPT "
>>  [ Evaluations: 0         Packets: 0         Bytes: 0           States: 0    
>>  ]
>>  [ Inserted: uid 0 pid 1901 State Creations: 0     ]
>> @12 pass log quick inet proto tcp from <tbl.r0.s:22> to <tbl.r0.d:4> port = 
>> smtp 
>> flags any modulate state label "RULE 0 -- ACCEPT "
>>  [ Evaluations: 111650386  Packets: 12362     Bytes: 891246      States: 24  
>>   
>> ]
>> 
>> 
>> I do see states changing on this rule @12.
>> 
>> What is the modulate state, I was looking in the book of PF didn't see it as 
>> modulate, what setting or how to change that?
>> 
>> Lastly, how to disable scrub in tcp reassembly. I am not sure.
>> 
>> I will look into these though
>> 
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Damien Fleuriot <m...@my.gd>
>> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
>> Sent: Tue, February 28, 2012 3:06:55 AM
>> Subject: Re: PF issue (rule match but rule fails)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 2/28/12 2:27 AM, csbender wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> it is great to join you.
>>> I am pretty new to the world of PF so please excuse some ignorance at least 
>>> for 
>>> 
>>> now. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I have a PF running freebsd 8.2. 
>>> 
>>> Here is my issue...
>>> 
>>> I have SMTP rule allowing traffic in and out for certain networks.
>>> Some SMTP traffic fails, eventhough I see rule match, I have no idea why.
>>> 
>>> Evidence...Here is am sending email from a network which comes across the 
>>> FW.
>>> Here is the tcpdump.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> # tcpdump -ni bge0 host 10.156.81.10 and port 25    
>>> tcpdump: listening on bge0, link-type EN10MB
>>> 14:26:50.220591 10.156.81.10.60809 > 172.19.4.41.25: S 
>>> 3154136673:3154136673(0) 
>>> 
>>> win 64240 <mss 
>>> 1260,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop> (DF) 
>>> [tos 
>>> 
>>> 0xb8]
>>> 14:26:50.244314 10.156.81.10.60809 > 172.19.4.41.25:R 
>>> 3154136674:3154136735(61) 
>>> 
>>> ack 1245040067 win 0 (DF) [tos 0xb8]
>>> 14:27:11.233494 10.156.81.10.60809 > 172.19.4.41.25: S 
>>> 3154136673:3154136673(0) 
>>> 
>>> win 64240 <mss 
>>> 1260,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop,nop> (DF) 
>>> [tos 
>>> 
>>> 0xb8]
>>> 14:27:11.245057 10.156.81.10.60809 > 172.19.4.41.25:R 0:61(61) ack 1 win 0 
>>> (DF) 
>>> 
>>> [tos 0xb8]
>>>> From the above it is easy to see traffic isn't passing. 
>>> 
>>> Below is the rule that this traffic should be matching.
>>> 
>>> pass log quick inet proto tcp from <tbl.r0.d> to any port = smtp flags any 
>>> modulate state label "RULE 1 -- ACCEPT "
>>> 
>>> First question ...what command can I run to verify that the rule above is 
>>> pertaining to the traffic above?
>>> Secondly....what else could be squashing this SMTP traffic. It all works 
>>> well 
>>> when pfctl is -d.
>>> 
>> 
>> First, check the logs from PF itself, not just a tcpdump from the
>> interface, and check what rule number matches:
>> 
>> tcpdump -nei pflog0
>> 
>> Then, obviously, display your pf rules and check what rule matched the
>> traffic, using its number: pfctl -vvsr
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Second, get rid of "modulate state" and use "keep state" instead.
>> 
>> Third, if that doesn't fix your problem, disable tcp reassembly in your
>> "scrub" rules.
>> 
>> We had similar problems with scrubbing + TCP reassembly enabled over a
>> year ago on 8.x
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>> 
_______________________________________________
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to