i mean doubt, shouldn't do mailing before the first coffee :))) On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM, István <lecc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i see > but there was no debt that it is possible. at least from my side :_) > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> 2009/10/20 István <lecc...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> > therefore i like netpipe runs you can see the performance and the >> latency as >> > well using the packet size as your "x" axis, i think it makes more sense >> > then just 1 number >> >> My point was to demonstrate that saturating gigabit ethernet is very >> doable with FreeBSD, and his limitation is more likely somewhere other >> than "TCP". >> >> I've told him privately to check CPU utilisation. I'll do the same on >> my boxes when I get some time; I'd like to know why I'm only seeing ~ >> 800mbit with large buffers. >> > > > > -- > the sun shines for all > > http://l1xl1x.blogspot.com > -- the sun shines for all http://l1xl1x.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
