On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> uhm: > > kristy# netperf -H 192.168.10.2 -p 22113 -l 10 > TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.10.2 > (192.168.10.2) port 0 AF_INET > Recv Send Send > Socket Socket Message Elapsed > Size Size Size Time Throughput > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec > > 8192 65536 65536 10.00 862.48 > > 1 megabyte socket buffers threw an error. I'll see why later. > > Now, as for why 64k socket buffers gave a slower result than 8k socket > buffers... ah. If I change the sending end to use 64k socket buffers: > > TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.10.2 > (192.168.10.2) port 0 AF_INET > Recv Send Send > Socket Socket Message Elapsed > Size Size Size Time Throughput > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec > > 65536 65536 65536 10.00 916.23 > > > > Adrian > > therefore i like netpipe runs you can see the performance and the latency as well using the packet size as your "x" axis, i think it makes more sense then just 1 number -- the sun shines for all http://l1xl1x.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
