I just did another test to a machine with a Chelsio card.

 Server D (cxl3) -> Server A = 3.5Gbps

Turning on flags lro tso4 tso6 vlanhwtso , yields

 Server D (cxl3) -> Server A = 9.1 Gbps

Oddly, this was an ipv4 iperf, but tso6 seems to help.

I had settings turned off per https://wiki.freebsd.org/10gFreeBSD/Router#Disabling_LRO_and_TSO

Servers A,B, and C are all running services.  Server D is acting as a router.  Are the LRO and TSO only for TCP to the box, or will it increase speeds for forwarding if I enable it?


Thanks,

Rudy


On 11/22/19 1:30 PM, BulkMailForRudy wrote:

I have nearly identical setups, but ix0 and ix1 are getting different options at boot.  This seems to be the only difference I see between machines and I am trying to answer the question, Why can Server A iperf close to line rate while the other servers can not?

The Test:  iperf -P 3 -c REMOTE_ADDR

Server A (ix1) -> Server C (ix0)  = 9.4Gbps
Server B (ix0)-> Server C (ix0) = 5.6Gbps
Server C (ix0)-> A (ix1) or B (ix0)  = 5.0Gbps


The motherboards are identical between A,B and C and the configs very similar.  The only difference is that Server A is plugged into ix1 while Server B and C are using ix0.


I am not modifying the flags at boot (eg ifconfig -tso), yet ix0 lacks TXCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,WOL.

ix0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=a538b9<RXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6>
        ether *ac:1f:6b:6a:14:6*4
        media: Ethernet autoselect (10Gbase-T <full-duplex>)
ix1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
options=e53fbb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
        ether *ac:1f:6b:6a:14:6*5
        media: Ethernet autoselect (10Gbase-T <full-duplex>)

I did try adding some flags to ix0 and -- not sure if this was the reason -- the box started acting oddly and I ended up rebooting it.


My hunch has is that there is somethign with the TSO4.


Rudy

_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to