On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 03:21:37PM -0400, John Jasen wrote: > On 03/17/2017 06:08 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:50:42PM -0400, John Jasen wrote: > > > >> As a few points of note, partial resolution, and curiosity: > >> > >> Following down leads that 11-STABLE had tryforward improvements over > >> 11-RELENG, I upgraded. The same tests (24 client streams over UDP with > >> small packets), the system went from passing 1.7m pps to about 2.5m. > >> > >> Following indications from Navdeep Parhar that UDP queue hashing is not as > >> efficient as it could be, we started running the tests with various powers > >> of 2 streams (2,4,8,16,32) -- and were able to push the system up to 5m > >> pps. > >> > >> We are currently seeing in the tests approximately 10-11m pps on the > >> outside interface, around 5-6m dropped, and 5 million passed. > > You want more? > > Yes.
OK. How many? What the current utilisation per core? What exactly hardware and software used? I mean netmap don't give to you many performance gain. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
