sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment.

  In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#127063, @jtl wrote:
  
  > Doesn't tp->t_rxtshift get updated on a successful send? If not, I think 
that is what we should be fixing.
  >
  > Personally, I think a connection should drop if we aren't able to send any 
ACKs for 350 seconds.
  
  
  It's t_shift >= 12 killing the connection, since no one actually stops the 
timer/performs RTT update for ACK if ENOBUFS happens on a receiving only 
connections.  So intermittent (not continuous) failures to transmit ACK due to 
ENOBUFS will kill a long living receiving only connection eventually.

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, lstewart, adrian, delphij, 
decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, 
freebsd-net-list, transport, jtl, hiren
Cc: mike-karels.net, jtl
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to