On 19Jan16, Jilles Tjoelker allegedly wrote: > I think the recv.2 and send.2 man pages are long enough as they are, and > separate recvmmsg.3 and sendmmsg.3 pages will be clearer. This is also > because recvmmsg/sendmmsg can be ignored when performance is good enough > without them. This differs from what Konstantin thinks.
If they are to be made separate man pages can I suggest that the recv/send(2) manpages be changes to at least make early reference to the *mmsg() calls? Purely as marketing. My perception is that awareness of the *mmsg() calls is rather limited. Mark. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
