hiren added a comment. >>! In D1711#60, @hiren wrote: >>>! In D1711#58, @rrs wrote: > >> hiren: >> >> This looks interesting to me, it is definitely something I would like to >> look at. I assume you >> are on 10.stable like Sean? > > Yes, its plain stable10+D1711. > Also, all 3 panics are from the same system.
>>! In D1711#62, @hiren wrote: >>>! In D1711#59, @rrs wrote: >> Hiren: >> >> Ok looking at kern_timeout.c thats a call to >> class->lc_lock(c_lock, lock_status); >> >> If my 10.x matches yours. > > It's not :-( > > Looks like what we have here is not stock stable10 really. I'll check all the > details and get back first thing in the morning tomorrow. > > Thanks for checking and sorry for the trouble. My bad. So yes, these machines are indeed stable10+D1711. I'll follow up separately on original comment. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1711 To: rrs, gnn, rwatson, lstewart, jhb, kostikbel, hselasky, adrian, imp, sbruno Cc: hiren, jhb, kostikbel, emaste, delphij, neel, erj, freebsd-net _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
