On 6/1/14, 8:01 PM, Rick Macklem wrote:
John Howie wrote:
[...]
Actually, I tend to think that using the code in sys/nfs/bootp_subr.c
is preferable to using the NFS stuff in stand that pxeboot does.
The only reason I know for pxeboot doing the NFS stuff and filling in
the nfsv3_diskless structure is historical. (Or that's what most people
use for x86, so it would be a POLA violation if it breaks, if you prefer.)
(Basically, the code in sys/nfs/bootp_subr.c is easier to maintain than the
stand alone NFS client pxeboot uses.)
As such, I don't think this work is necessary, rick
it's probably worth having both options
John. great work BTW.
Regards,
John
j...@thehowies.com (personal) | jho...@email.arizona.edu (academic) |
j.ho...@napier.ac.uk (academic) | jho...@cloudsecurityalliance.org
(work)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
