John Howie wrote: > Hi all, > > I apologize for the cross posting of this email, but I believe it > will be > of interest to people across all three groups. Please feel free to > forward > to additional groups if you feel they would benefit. > > I have seen a few posts on and off over the years about Windows > Server > DHCP not working with FreeBSD. Specifically, the Windows Server DHCP > would > not return the boot host name/IP address and the root path. The > typical > response to ³why won¹t it work" has typically been that there is a > flaw in > Windows Server DHCP code. I did a little digging and found that the > problem actually lies in code in FreeBSD. > > Section 3.5 of RFC 2131 (the DHCP RFC) states that ³...Second, in its > initial DHCPDISCOVER or DHCPREQUEST message, a client may provide the > server with a list of specific parameters the client is interested > inŠ² > and ³...The client can inform the server which configuration > parameters > the client is interested in by including the 'parameter request list' > option. The data portion of this option explicitly lists the options > requested by tag numberŠ². A DHCP Server is not required to return > any > parameter that a client does not ask for. It appears that the > ISC-DHCP > server, which is recommended by most, will return configured options > regardless of whether or not the client asks for them. > > There are two places in the FreeBSD codebase that DHCP is used to > boot the > system over a network. The first is in the boot loader, which uses > code in > lib/libstand. The second is in the NFS code, in sys/nfs. The code is > sys/nfs is not always used if the boot loader sets up the environment > for > the NFS code, either by passing parameters to the kernel (as PXEBOOT > appears to do), or information is configured in the boot loader > configuration files, e.g. /boot/loader.rc. > > I have attached two unified diff files which I ask people to test, > before > I submit them for inclusion into the codebase as fixes. The first, > bootp.c.diff fixes the code in lib/libstand/bootp.c to request the > boot > host (option 12, aka TAG_HOSTNAME) and the NFS root path (option 17, > aka > TAG_ROOTPATH). This fix has been tested with PXEBOOT on an amd64 box > and > ubldr on an ARM/RaspberryPI system. The second, bootp_subr.c.diff, > fixes > code in sys/nfs/bootp_subr.c to request the same options and also to > fix > bugs that erroneously reported the IP address of the BOOTP/DHCP > server. > The code assumed that the BOOTP/DHCP server was also the boot host. > Please > send me all feedback directly. > > The diff files work with 10.0-RELEASE through 10.0-RELEASE-p3, but > will > likely work with 9.0 and also CURRENT and STABLE, including 11.0, as > the > code is old code that does not appear to have changed in a while. If > you > want to try it on those systems please, please make sure you have > backup > copies just in case. > > If you do not have experience configuring Windows Server DHCP just > drop me > an email, and I will send you a cheat sheet to get you up and > running. > > I am going to grab the latest ubldr code to see if I can get it to > work > more like PXEBOOT, that appears to pass parameters to the kernel to > avoid > the need for the NFS BOOTP/DHCP process. If you test on an ARM system > with > ubldr in RELEASE you will see a lot of unnecessary network activity > going > on, that we should be able to fix. > Actually, I tend to think that using the code in sys/nfs/bootp_subr.c is preferable to using the NFS stuff in stand that pxeboot does.
The only reason I know for pxeboot doing the NFS stuff and filling in the nfsv3_diskless structure is historical. (Or that's what most people use for x86, so it would be a POLA violation if it breaks, if you prefer.) (Basically, the code in sys/nfs/bootp_subr.c is easier to maintain than the stand alone NFS client pxeboot uses.) As such, I don't think this work is necessary, rick > Regards, > > John > > j...@thehowies.com (personal) | jho...@email.arizona.edu (academic) | > j.ho...@napier.ac.uk (academic) | jho...@cloudsecurityalliance.org > (work) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
