W dniu 2014-04-25 16:02, Steven Hartland pisze: > We find that large numbers of queues causes high interrupt issues > however at a guess you did this to enable the machine to boot with > all nics due to lack of auto mbuf tuning in 9.x. > > I'd go with ~2 queues per nic.
Yes, probably you're right as the modification date points to the time period when I turned on the LAGG As I understand, on 10.x it's fixed and having more queues results in better performance? As far as I will have faster transfer between storage1 and storage2, I'd plan to upgrade 9.x to 10.x Cheers, Marek _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
