On 4 August 2013 15:54, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rm...@netbsd.org> wrote: > Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> I think it's slightly unfair to propose a new extension for BPF >> without any in-tree users. >> > > We have in-tree user in NetBSD as mentioned in the previous email:
Ah, cool. I missed that. >> > It provides us a capability to offload more complex packet processing. >> > My primary user would be NPF in NetBSD, e.g. one of the operations is to >> > lookup an IP address in a table/ipset. > > I would like to coordinate the reservation of BPF opcodes though. That's a good idea. I have no problem with that. -adrian _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
