Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it's slightly unfair to propose a new extension for BPF > without any in-tree users. >
We have in-tree user in NetBSD as mentioned in the previous email: > > It provides us a capability to offload more complex packet processing. > > My primary user would be NPF in NetBSD, e.g. one of the operations is to > > lookup an IP address in a table/ipset. I would like to coordinate the reservation of BPF opcodes though. -- Mindaugas _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
