> This brings up a long standing sore point of our routing code > which this patch makes more pronounced. When an interface link > state is down I don't want the route to it to persist but to > become inactive so another path can be chosen. This the very > point of running a routing daemon. So on the link-down event > the installed interface routes should be removed from the routing > table. The configured addresses though should persist and the > interface routes re-installed on a link-up event. What's your > opinion on it?
Yes please! This is what I take for granted on my routers. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
