Hello, Ian. You wrote 30 августа 2012 г., 10:23:56: >> Yep, I'll collapse my two-rule chains in one rule. IS> I guess if the issue persists, we may need to see more of your ruleset. Not a problem at all, here it is: http://lev.serebryakov.spb.ru/_sklad/firewall.ipfw
IS> Hmm, you shouldn't see ANY pppoe traffic on ng0, only on the interface IS> mpd5 uses to connect with your DSL modem/bridge. Nor would you expect Yep. I didn't see it. My question is, really: why vr1 (my physical interface, used to connect to my ISP) takes 50%+ of CPU when traffic is only 40mbit/s down and about 20mbit/s up (with many connections)? I was afraid, that all PPPoE traffic is inspected by ipfw and it causes additional CPU load. Yes, it is only 500Mhz Geode LX, but it is only 40 mbit/s and 4.5Kpps in both directions, nothing like full 100Mbit or more, and I've learned "empirical" rule/heuristics about 1Gbit(!) per 1Ghz(!) for softrouters, So, theoretically, 40mbit should not be a problem at all for this hardware. And now I have not-working WiFi (this box is also AP) when wired traffic is high (wifi speed drops down to 100KB/s from 2.5-3MB/s without wired traffic), userland freezes under load (very bad with ULE, better with 4BSD), and inability to pass through 40Mbit in both directions simultaneously. -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <l...@freebsd.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
