On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:02:35PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Regarding the 8.1 if_rum(4) panics... I got a similar one, extracted
> a dump and tried to gather some info for someone who knows the code:
>
> The zero divide fault was because (apparently) rate was unitialized,
> as is
>
> ((struct ieee80211_node *)
> m->M_dat.MH.MH_pkthdr.rcvif)->ni_vap->iv_txparms[0]
>
> i.e. struct ieee80211_txparam &vap->iv_txparms[0] in case it matters.
Yes, its seems that ratectl framework sometimes set ni->ni_txrate to 0
This can be mitigated by patch [1] or by setting ucastrate option in
ifconfig. Still real issue need to be solved.
--
Adios
Index: sys/dev/usb/wlan/if_rum.c
@@ -1153,9 +1153,11 @@
rate = params->ibp_rate0;
if (!ieee80211_isratevalid(ic->ic_rt, rate)) {
+ device_printf(sc->sc_dev, "invalid rate=%d\n", rate);
m_freem(m0);
return EINVAL;
}
+
flags = 0;
if ((params->ibp_flags & IEEE80211_BPF_NOACK) == 0)
flags |= RT2573_TX_NEED_ACK;
@@ -1217,6 +1219,13 @@
else
rate = ni->ni_txrate;
+ /* XXX ieee80211_ratectl sometimes set ni->ni_txrate to 0 */
+ if (!ieee80211_isratevalid(ic->ic_rt, rate)) {
+ device_printf(sc->sc_dev, "invalid rate=%d\n", rate);
+ m_freem(m0);
+ return EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (wh->i_fc[1] & IEEE80211_FC1_WEP) {
k = ieee80211_crypto_encap(ni, m0);
if (k == NULL) {
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
