On 12 Mar 2010, at 04:32, batcilla itself wrote:
2010/2/11 Rui Paulo <rpa...@freebsd.org>
On 10/02/2010 22:24, batcilla itself wrote:
On 3 Jan 2010, at 12:23, Kim Culhan wrote:
[skip...]
This is odd. What happens without the bridge?
--
Rui Paulo
I guess without the bridge ping going w/o any problem.
I also tried couple of configs with wlan in different wlanmode,
hostap etc:
it is precisely same as Kim wrote. In case of use routed
connection it
work just fine.
In case of:
[host1]----(eth===bridge0===gif)----
wlan0=====wirelesslink=====wlan0---(gif===bridge0===eth)----[host2]
it is works and host1 can ping host2.
in case of
[host1]----(eth===bridge0===wlan0)----====wirelesslink====-----
(wlan0===bridge0===etc)---[host2]
broadcast packets including arp can go through bridge, other packets
miss after leaving wlan in direction of wirelesslink.
I seen this on very recent 8-STABLE. (FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #1: Thu Feb
4 23:03:37 EET 2010)
Can it be somehow linked with experimental bridging support for a
mesh?
May be there is some sysctl need to be set in non-default value.
I also repeat same test with 9-CURRENT ( FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Thu
Feb 4 16:16:02 UTC 2010 ).
This is really odd...
I think this is more likely related to ARP and routing table
issues. I asked the submitter to use p5-SVN-Bisect in order to find
the revision that broke.
Is there any progress/revision found? I have a good test-place: 2
links outdoor with full control from ethernet side and on-my-table
setup also, so I can test almost instantly. Also have a pair of SR71a
(3x3 MIMO .11n) - also can test with TDMA or w/o it.
Just call.
No time yet to play with this. Sorry.
--
Rui Paulo
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
