2010/2/11 Rui Paulo <rpa...@freebsd.org> > > On 10/02/2010 22:24, batcilla itself wrote: >>>> >>>> On 3 Jan 2010, at 12:23, Kim Culhan wrote: >> >> [skip...] >> >>> This is odd. What happens without the bridge? >>> >>> -- >>> Rui Paulo >> >> I guess without the bridge ping going w/o any problem. >> >> I also tried couple of configs with wlan in different wlanmode, hostap etc: >> it is precisely same as Kim wrote. In case of use routed connection it >> work just fine. >> In case of: >> [host1]----(eth===bridge0===gif)----wlan0=====wirelesslink=====wlan0---(gif===bridge0===eth)----[host2] >> it is works and host1 can ping host2. >> in case of >> [host1]----(eth===bridge0===wlan0)----====wirelesslink====-----(wlan0===bridge0===etc)---[host2] >> broadcast packets including arp can go through bridge, other packets >> miss after leaving wlan in direction of wirelesslink. >> >> I seen this on very recent 8-STABLE. (FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #1: Thu Feb >> 4 23:03:37 EET 2010) >> >> Can it be somehow linked with experimental bridging support for a mesh? >> May be there is some sysctl need to be set in non-default value. >> >> I also repeat same test with 9-CURRENT ( FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Thu >> Feb 4 16:16:02 UTC 2010 ). >> >> This is really odd... > > I think this is more likely related to ARP and routing table issues. I asked > the submitter to use p5-SVN-Bisect in order to find the revision that broke.
Is there any progress/revision found? I have a good test-place: 2 links outdoor with full control from ethernet side and on-my-table setup also, so I can test almost instantly. Also have a pair of SR71a (3x3 MIMO .11n) - also can test with TDMA or w/o it. Just call. -- //batcilla _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
