On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 09:42:27PM +0500, rihad wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > rihad wrote: > >> Oleg Bulyzhin wrote: > > > >> You probably have some special sources of documentation ;-) According > >> to man ipfw, both "netgraph/ngtee" and "pipe" decide the fate of the > >> packet unless one_pass=0. Or do you mean sprinkling smart skiptos here > >> and there? ;-) > >> > > > > ngtee should not have any affect on the packet.. it takes a copy.. > > > That's a logical conclusion, although I prefer trusting the man at hand > (pun intended) if I haven't tested it myself to see how it works: > > ngtee cookie > A copy of packet is diverted into netgraph, original packet is > either accepted or continues with the next rule, depending on > net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass sysctl variable. See ng_ipfw(4) > for more > information on netgraph and ngtee actions. > > > Although... I've a question to Mr. Oleg: > > > 2) use 'tee' rule with ng_ksocket & ng_netflow > > tee port > Send a copy of packets matching this rule to the divert(4) > socket > bound to port port. The search continues with the next rule. > > how is it different from one_pass=0? Both tee and ngtee w/ one_pass=0 > continue with the next rule.
tee & ngtee are similar with one_pass=0 and different with one_pass=1 -- Oleg. ================================================================ === Oleg Bulyzhin -- OBUL-RIPN -- OBUL-RIPE -- o...@rinet.ru === ================================================================ _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
