On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:03:20PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> Stefan:
> 
> You are correct: This is not real security. In fact, I would argue that it's 
> not security at all. 
> 
> But many businesses that have to maintain hotspots -- especially some hotel 
> chains -- are "allergic" to any sort of serious security. This is because a 
> small but vocal subset of their customers just want to get on the Net and 
> complain about any sort of security. Even having to enter a password or a WEP 
> key irks them. (I personally think that these people are ignorant fools and 
> are setting themselves up for identity theft and worse, but that's just me. 
> And the businesses seem more willing to allow piracy of their Wi-Fi than to 
> irritate these boneheads.) Also, these systems have to be usable by some 
> fairly lame devices -- e.g. an XBox -- that aren't really computers and don't 
> have the capability to run secure protocols or even a particularly good Web 
> browser built in.
> 
> So, painful as it is, I have to help these guys implement systems which 
> "bless" MAC addresses. The "arp -s" command can sort of lock an IP to a MAC 
> address, but awkwardly and only for outbound packets. What I'd like is to get 
> this into the firewall, so I can not only block spoofing but trigger a log 
> entry when it happens.
> 

Sounds like wlan_acl(4) may be of interest to you.

- Christian

-- 
Christian Brueffer      ch...@unixpages.org     bruef...@freebsd.org
GPG Key:         http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc
GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B  B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D

Attachment: pgp2gxmKKdNIj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to