>>>>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:19:55 -0700, >>>>> "Krejsa, Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Some code in the in6_update_ifa() function in netinet6/in6.c > enforces that if an IPv6 destination address is specified for > an interface address, the interface must be point-to-point or > loopback (fine), and the corresponding prefix length must be > exactly 128 bits. > The latter seems (at least naively) to conflict with > the definition in > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-over-ppp-v2-02.txt > that the interface identifier length for PPP interfaces is 64 bits, and > correspondingly prefixes accepted from a router advertisement > must also be 64 bits long; see section 5.5.3 in > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-08.txt So shouldn't you simply specify the prefix length of 64 without specifying the *destination* address of the p2p link? JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
