On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Randall Stewart wrote: > Hmm.. I would think 512b and 1K will not show any > improvement.. since they would probably end up either > in an mbuf chain.. or a single 2k (or maybe 4k) cluster..
I know, I just want to make sure that it doesn't somehow cause performance loss for those cases! > In fact I have always thought we should: > > a) have no data portion in an mbuf.. just pointers i.e. always > an EXT > > b) Have a 256/512 and 1k cluster too.. Implement and benchmark it. :) Mike "Silby" Silbersack _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
