Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Randall Stewart wrote:
Hmm.. I would think 512b and 1K will not show any
improvement.. since they would probably end up either
in an mbuf chain.. or a single 2k (or maybe 4k) cluster..
I know, I just want to make sure that it doesn't somehow cause performance
loss for those cases!
In fact I have always thought we should:
a) have no data portion in an mbuf.. just pointers i.e. always
an EXT
b) Have a 256/512 and 1k cluster too..
Hmm.. I could do that.. maybe I will when my
plate clears off a bit.. but then again.. that may
be never :-0
R
Implement and benchmark it. :)
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
--
Randall Stewart
NSSTG - Cisco Systems Inc.
803-345-0369 <or> 815-342-5222 (cell)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
