On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:37:28PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:43, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > This needs to be fixed in pf then.
> >
> > Max Laier and I discussed this issue once, and Max had concern
> > over possible performance degradation that might result from
> > calling pflog functions through pointers to be set by a separate
> > pflog module.  We can skip touching the pf module in RELENG_6 for
> > now and leave the issue to after 6.1-RELEASE is out.
> 
> I have convinced myself that we should really use a function pointer here.  I 
> will try to commit a sollution to HEAD over the weekend.  If you are MFC'ing 
> the changes *now*, I'd appreciate if you could spare out pf, but I am willing 
> to MFC the changes before 6.1 if testing goes well.

Thank you, Max!  Let me assure you I won't touch modules/pf in
RELENG_6 until you think it is OK to.  I'll devote some time to
testing the other modules WRT the change in the meanwhile.

-- 
Yar
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to