On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:10:50AM +0530, Srinivas Goud wrote: > Hello All, > I am new bee to this group. > I am working on IPv6 Extension headers. I am confused with freeBSD > implementation and RFC2460 specification for Destination options. > > My interpretation from RFC2460 is that, If a packet consists of > hop-by-hop and destination extension headers, destination header > should be inserted inside AH. > i.e., hop + AH + dst. > > But freeBSD implementation is the other way, > i.e., hop + dst + AH. > > which is the correct way of implementation according to RFC2460? Please > let me know, if my interpretation is wrong. > > Also, let me know AH insertion place in the following cases. > 1. hop + dst > 2. hop + dst + route > 3. hop + dst + route + dst > 4. hop + dst + dst > 5. hop + dst + dst + route + route > 6. hop + dst + dst + route + route + dst + dst > 7. hop + dst + dst + route + dst + route + dst + dst > > Any help/suggestion is greatly appreciated.
The FreeBSD IPv6 implementation largly provided by the KAME project (www.kame.net), you might have better luck addressing your question to them. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
pgpYckg6XovGw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
