On Friday, 10 June 2005 at 22:26:01 -0700, Stephen J. Bevan wrote: > Jeremie Le Hen writes: >> Given the simplicity of gif(4) IP-encapsulated packets, I wonder >> how Linux guys could have implemented something else in their IPIP >> module :-). > > They didn't, Linux IPIP exactly what it sounds like it does: IP in IP > encapsulation. The confusion seems to be on the part of FreeBSD guys > who can't tell their gre(4) from their gif(4) :-)
Certainly that confusion exists. But it doesn't seem to be the problem here: the original poster (Gianmarco?) stated that he had tried to set up a tunnel with gif(4), which would mean an IP-IP tunnel. Greg -- The virus contained in this message was not detected. Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
pgp2zgIYqBUnU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
