On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:52:33PM -0700, Bruce M Simpson wrote: B> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:28:22PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: B> > >It annoys me that we have to resort to BPF to send IP datagrams on B> > >unnumbered interfaces. Here is a half baked idea. Please look and B> > >tell me what you think. B> > B> > I've sent lots of datagrams on un-numberred interfaces using netgraph.. B> B> I should qualify my post a bit more: I began thinking along these lines B> with the intention of enabling ISC dhcp (and dhclient) to be compiled B> without using bpf support. I don't have the time or interest to port ISC B> dhcp to use netgraph, but I'd be interested to see the results if that B> happened.
ng_device can be attached to "orphans" hook of ng_ether. /dev/ngdX opened by dhcpd, and packets processed. What is benefit to get rid of bpf? What is problem with it? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
