George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
At Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:52:33 -0700,
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:28:22PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
It annoys me that we have to resort to BPF to send IP datagrams on
unnumbered interfaces. Here is a half baked idea. Please look and
tell me what you think.
I've sent lots of datagrams on un-numberred interfaces using netgraph..
I should qualify my post a bit more: I began thinking along these lines
with the intention of enabling ISC dhcp (and dhclient) to be compiled
without using bpf support. I don't have the time or interest to port ISC
dhcp to use netgraph, but I'd be interested to see the results if that
happened.
Just one quick question. Does the use of this option require root
privilege? I think it should :-)
netgraph requires root privs to set up a graph..
Later,
George
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
