On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:07 +0100 > >>>>> Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > bms> Whilst scanning GNATS, I found a number of PRs relating to requests > bms> for tcp_wrappers functionality and some outright bugfixes. Rather than > bms> commit these as-is, I think we should push the changes back to Wietse, > bms> as we maintain tcp_wrappers on a vendor branch. > > bms> The PRs in question are: > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/31034 > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32808 > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/36556 > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/42336 > > bms> What does everyone else think? > > Many part of our code is already off a vender branch since IPv6 > support, and it seems Wietse doesn't maintain tcp_wrappers actively.
Post from Wietse (who is on Cc: as I see) about this from yesterday ... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=postfix-users&m=108784059323250&w=2 /me remebers to have sent some patches to Wietse in 2002 that luckily didn't get comitted though CIDR notation is pretty nice ;-) -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
