Hi, >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:07 +0100 >>>>> Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
bms> Whilst scanning GNATS, I found a number of PRs relating to requests bms> for tcp_wrappers functionality and some outright bugfixes. Rather than bms> commit these as-is, I think we should push the changes back to Wietse, bms> as we maintain tcp_wrappers on a vendor branch. bms> The PRs in question are: bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/31034 bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32808 bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/36556 bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/42336 bms> What does everyone else think? Many part of our code is already off a vender branch since IPv6 support, and it seems Wietse doesn't maintain tcp_wrappers actively. So, I think it is better to integrate tcp_wrappers into our tree rather than maintaining it in contrib like NetBSD does. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED],jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
