Hi again > > One thing I hate about comparison shopping for computers ... there > are sooooo many options :(
- what are your needs vs. $, kinda answers this. > > What is the difference between Layer2 and Layer3, and what does > that affect? All switching is done in layer2! Layer3 switch 'features' (functionality) is was the vendor put in the box. Depending on the amount of $ you're going to spent, you can have switches that can act as routers. > > I see the HP Procurve 2626 (I don't need 50 ports yet) for ~$600 on > the web ... while I can pick up the Dell PowerConnect 3324 is ~$500 > ... > > How do I compare the two? They seem to both use different > terminologies for what I'd guess are the same thing: > > HP: > Throughput: 2650 - 10.1 mpps (64-byte packets) 2626 - 6.6 mpps > (64-byte packets) Switching capacity: 2650 - 13.6 Gbps 2626 - 9.6 > Gbps > > Dell: > Switch Fabric Capacity 8.8 Gb/s > Forwarding Rate 6.5 Mpps > > So, in both cases, the HP is faster, but ... is that 6.6mpps "per > port" (ie. the pp?) ... right now, I'm seeing max of around 3Mps > going out a server, with average being well below 1 ... so I can't > see hitting that high any time soon ... The mpps is normally what the switch can do in total / back-plan back-bone or whatever the vendor want to call it. > > Based on the #s for throughput, I can't see a big advantage of HP > over Dell to warrant the extra cost, but I see nothing on Dell > about the Layer2/3 stuff ... but not sure what that gives either > ... If you're going to calculate a $ pr. port cost-benefit, then you have to make sure the rest of your setup is balanced accordingly (why spent time on $ pr. port if the nic in the rest of the setup is cheap) > > Price wise, both the HP and Dell versions look reasonable, and I > think the Dell is easier for me to get in Panama (I know there is a > local office for them there) ... There's a lot more to network boxes (router, bridge, switch et al.) than just price and capacity, e.g. management, (I)OS, firmware, support. best of luck. respectfully /per [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I've had one + for Dell ... does anyone have any caveats against > them? Or kudos too? > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Per Engelbrecht wrote: > >> Hi, >> Don't know your budget, but HP Procurve 2650 (layer2/layer3 >> hybrid) works just fine. Full managed, snmp et al. >> >> respectfully >> /per >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > >> > I'm looking at replacing my el'cheapo switch with something >> > better that will allow me to fix my issues with the >> > em/full-duplex problem ... >> > >> > I'm looking for ssomething managed, as well as SNMP aware so >> > that I can tie it into Zabbix for monitoring ... something 8 or >> > 12 port preferred. >> > >> > Cisco, of course, is always a big name ... but also expensive >> > ... oen recommendation is the xl 1900, but I can't find any >> > specs on her at cisco's site, so discontinued product? >> > >> > What about Netgear, which I have easy access to? Or Alcatel? >> > >> > models to stay away from? >> > >> > Thanks ... >> > >> > ---- >> > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services >> > (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: >> > yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 >> > _______________________________________________ >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> >> >> > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: > yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
