Hello! On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:40:22AM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> > The patch set is pretty extensive and intrusive and only for 4.x. Adding > > locking for 5.x would be a pretty nice challenge as well and not easy to > > get right for all cases. > > > > > This is one thing that I would like to use, without patching systems. But > > > then thats just my 'wish list' opinion of it. > > > > I think is makes more sense to get something like userland BSD. > > Userland BSD might need too many resources. > Think of hosting providers who run hundreds or thousands of virtual hosts > in a jail. Please take a look at commercial solutions like FreeVPS by H-Sphere > or Virtuozzo by SWSoft. I might add that having userland BSD is very useful feature. But from my experience with UML (User Mode Linux) I can say that it hardly can be useful for anything except development (kernel debugging, userland development for different kernel version etc.). /fjoe _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
