On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Chuck Swiger wrote: > By itself, NAT provides no benefit to security, and some implementations > actually reduce the security of the system compared with not running NAT. Let > me pull out a couple of quotes from various people:
Please explain this point more. Say I have 1000 win 9x boxes connected to the internet with routable IPs and no firewall. How will placing them behind a NAT box make them less secure? Mike "Silby" Silbersack _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
