---------- In Response to your message ------------- > Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:29:44 +0100 > To: "J. W. Ballantine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Guido van Rooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: route pointing to a gateway that's not on net > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 03:07:26PM -0500, J. W. Ballantine wrote: > > Quite frankly, blunt is not a problem, one needs to call them as one sees > > them. However, responding to a question with a condesending, superior > > attitude(IMHO), while ignoring the question is. As for "just try what > > people tell you", if it doesn't appear resolve the larger problem, but jus t > > the example, than it isn't the correct resolution to the issue and trying > > to get clarification shouldn't be scorned, after all there is always someo ne > > out there who knows more. > > I did answer your question. You should either add host routes or turn > on proxy arp at the gateway. In stead of telling us if that worked > out you come with different questions. > > Have you actually tried the 3 different possibilities mentioned in > my mail with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? > > -Guido >
Of the 3 different possibilities mentioned: I did try route add -net without -iface, and the result was no route to host. I didn't try to arp to 207.172.3.* hosts because that sounded like a fix for only one small network and I asked for clarification. The other single host routes for each host again doesn't resolve the larger issue of basic network access. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
