Use :

route add -net 10.17.47.37/32 -cloning -iface xl0

that sould work.

On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, J. W. Ballantine wrote:

>
> Sorry, my typo.  I did try
>  route add -net 10.0.0.0 -interface xl0
> and
>  route add -net 10.17.47.37 -interface xl0
>
> As I recall both didn't respond with a error message, but when I tried to
> get out it didn't work.
>
> I'll try again tonight and see what happens.
>
> Thanks
>
> ----------  In Response to your message -------------
>
> >  Date:  Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:47:30 -0800 (PST)
> >  To:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  From:  "Kevin Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  Subject:  Re: route pointing to a gateway that's not on net
> >
> >
> >  > Well it's not the way I wanted it, but it's the way I have to try and
> >  > work with.
> >  >
> >  > I tried the route add net 10.0.0.0 -interface (whatever)
> >  > and that didn't work for me.
> >
> >  That's not the syntax I gave you, and obviously it needs to have your
> >  local interface information inserted.  I can confirm that the command:
> >
> >  route add -net 10.0.0.0 -interface em0
> >
> >  does parse and operate correctly on my 4.7 system, as confirmed by netstat
> >  -nr.  That is the general approach for directing traffic out a local
> >  interface rather than to a same-subnet gateway.
> >
> >  Try looking at man route for the details, or perhaps someone else will
> >  respond with a higher level of hand-holding.
> >
> >  KeS
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Reply via email to