On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2002-07-12 07:45 +0000, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > > > So I guess that what we're dealing with isn't really a > > "monodirectional" ring. Right? > > No it isn't. It looks more like the "dining philosophers" problem. > But that problem's solution would require at least one mutex for every > part of the ring :-( Te stuff under consideration originally came from OSF/1 which became true-64 that was heavily SMP can anyone find out what they did? > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Alfred Perlstein
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Archie Cobbs
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Alfred Perlstein
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Julian Elischer
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Alfred Perlstein
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Bosko Milekic
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Jon Mini
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Bosko Milekic
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Jon Mini
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Giorgos Keramidas
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Julian Elischer
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Andrew Gallatin
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Bosko Milekic
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Andrew Gallatin
- RE: mbuf external buffer reference counters Jim McGrath
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Scott Hess
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Kelly Yancey
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Bosko Milekic
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Kelly Yancey
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Bosko Milekic
- Re: mbuf external buffer reference counters Barney Wolff