On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> I have kept the current limits in place, but I think that it's somewhat > ugly to have this policy enforced in the allocator where it is hard to > adjust with a sysctl. Perhaps maxsockets could stay but become run time > adjustable. > > Is there any case where we will have lots of pcbs w/o sockets? If so, all > of the limits checking can be done in the socket code and the pcb code can > completely forget about it. I believe that the various pcb structures are tightly coupled to sockets, so checking only in the socket code should be safe. That would be a good change. > > Once everything's UMA'd, then we can develop new sizing parameters. > > Everything has been UMA'd other than MD code, so I'm working on making the > system take advantage of it. Ah, neat. I haven't cvsup'd in the last two weeks, so I have yet to play around with UMA. I was going to ask some more questions here, but it's probably best that I actually look at the code first. :) Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
