1. It is a misnomer to refer to "shared secret" in RFC 1948. The secret is not shared with any entity. 2. Implying that because DES can be brute-forced that MD5 can be brute-forced is just silly. Yes, in another 100 years, if Moore's Law continues to hold, which is unlikely. Suggestion - write an internet-draft and get the end2end group to endorse your scheme, rather than commiting FreeBSD to it. Barney Wolff To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; review n... Mike Silbersack
- Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; review n... Mike Silbersack
- Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; review n... Terry Lambert
- Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; review n... Mike Silbersack
- Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; rev... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; review n... Don Lewis
- Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; review n... Mike Silbersack
- Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; rev... Terry Lambert
- Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; review n... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; rev... Terry Lambert
- Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; review n... Barney Wolff
- Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; rev... Mike Silbersack