> > >>
> > >Except that it does not allow to use proto 94 (the default for nos-tun).
> >
> > I'm sure we can work something out with the KAME guys over this, if it
> > is necessary to keep this in. *chalks up another task*
> >
> It should be pretty easy to add the ``int gif_pproto'' member to the
> gif_softc structure, and expand gif_ioctl() interface to handle smth
> like SIOC[SG]IFPPROTO (where PPROTO stands for "physical protocol").
At least it's need to add some mechanism for dynamic changing of inetsw.
Something like that must exist in netgraph, IIRC.
And I agree that when all nos-tun's functions be implemented
nos-tun must go away.
But can anyone say when ?
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/CC/IT d-@ s: a- C++ UBSC++++$ P++>+++@ L- E--- W+ N++ o? K? w>-- O- M- V-
PS@ PE@ Y+ PGP>+ t 5 X R tv- b+++(++++) DI-- D+(++) G>++ e- h--- r y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
