Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> In article <local.mail.freebsd-net/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    > you write:
> >On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 08:47:57AM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 02:28:47PM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> >> > -On [20010308 22:02], Rafael Tonin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> > >I'm having some problems on configuring my just purchased
> >> > >Intel PRO/100+ PCI (reported by Intel as being P#: 689661-004).
> >> > >
> >> > >When booting, FreeBSD 4.2 reports:
> >> > >
> >> > >fxp0: <Intel Pro 10/100B/100+ Ethernet> at device 13.0 on pci0
> >> > >fxp0: could not map memory
> >> > 
> >> > You might want to try the latest sources Jonathan Lemon [cc:'d] came up
> >> > with.  I've looked at the diffs and he did some nice cleanups to bring
> >> > the driver into the present.  This might also fix your problem.
> >> > 
> >> > Jona, did you already have tarball for 4-STABLE which people can just
> >> > extract and compile a new kernel with?
> >> 
> >> Hmm, no.  I should probably generate one.  However, I do have the 
>> miibus.ko and if_fxp.ko binary modules for 4-STABLE, if you want 
> >> to just drop those in a system and use it.
> >> 
> >>     http://www.flugsvamp.com/~jlemon/fbsd/drivers/
> >
> >I have a -stable box with a pair of 82559s on the motherboard
> >that I can use for testing, if you need/want testers for -stable.
> 
> I've had a bunch of people test it already, thanks.  However, I would
> still like to hear from someone whos card did not work before the 
> driver was upgraded, but does work now.

FYI, on a REALLY OLD fxp:

fxp0: <Intel Pro 10/100B/100+ Ethernet> port 0xff20-0xff3f mem 
0xff800000-0xff8fffff,0xffbde000-0xffbdefff irq 2 at device 6.0 on pci0
fxp0: using memory space register mapping
fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:49:aa:d3
fxp0: PCI IDs: 8086 1229 0000 0000
nsphy0: <DP83840 10/100 media interface> on miibus0
nsphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
bpf: fxp0 attached

This actually does have the NatSemi phy on it and it is correctly detected.
Unfortunately, I just locked that machine up with SMPng. oops.  I can't
verify that it works just yet..  We have another old machine with a NS
phy on it (pII based instead of PPro based) and are working on it now.

Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Reply via email to