On 2015-01-27 16:21, Dirk Engling wrote: > On 27.01.15 22:12, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > >> Yes. Sometimes I have a feeling that jails or some other features are >> unwanted children. I had PR opened for years with patche to rc.d/jail or >> etc/rc.subr to incorporate nice, or cpuset. And it never found it's way >> to the tree. > > How's that possible? > > I felt similarly frustrated when I went to 2013's BSDCan trying to talk > to the "jaily people" and noone was around. Jamie couldn't attend but > said that he's busy with other stuff and couldn't commit time to jail > development. Which, of course, is fine. It leaves a void, though. > > What good are features that are neither documented nor exposed to the > users? How do we move on from here and get config and docs synchronized > and where can I get a big picture of what's the big plan for the future? > > erdgeist > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >
If there are problems with documentation, and you have corrections or suggested additions, I would be happy to help shepard those into the handbook or manpages -- Allan Jude
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
