Dirk Engling wrote on 01/27/2015 22:21:
On 27.01.15 22:12, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Yes. Sometimes I have a feeling that jails or some other features are
unwanted children. I had PR opened for years with patche to rc.d/jail or
etc/rc.subr to incorporate nice, or cpuset. And it never found it's way
to the tree.
How's that possible?
I felt similarly frustrated when I went to 2013's BSDCan trying to talk
to the "jaily people" and noone was around. Jamie couldn't attend but
said that he's busy with other stuff and couldn't commit time to jail
development. Which, of course, is fine. It leaves a void, though.
What good are features that are neither documented nor exposed to the
users? How do we move on from here and get config and docs synchronized
and where can I get a big picture of what's the big plan for the future?
I don't know if it is because "FreeBSD has insufficient man power" to
fulfill all related tasks. I just think this is the root cause why we
still have "simple jails" while Linux folks pushed their train hard and
now are far away with many "jail like" containers solutions allowing
projects like Docker to happened.
And this is sad.
Miroslav Lachman
_______________________________________________
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
