Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > The world would be a much nicer place if people would stop redefining
> > technical terms to mean whatever suits them.
> I think you're overreacting. You say: if the database is consistent,
> it's ACID ("Avoiding database corruption is a necessary requirement
> for, rather than a consequence of, ACID") and I say: if the database
> is ACID, it's consistent. Aren't we both right?First, that's not what I'm saying. Look up "requirement" and "consequence" in a dictionary (and read up on Leibniz if you feel like it) Second, ACID is much more than not corrupting the database. It also means returning consistent results for the duration of a transaction, for instance. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
