[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) writes: > Gary Corcoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The confusing thing is that I thought 'real' time should be >= 'user' + > > 'sys'. > > But here 'user' is much greater than 'real' for both machines! The sense I > > got from the other messages in this thread is that 'user' time is somewhat > > meaningless (i.e. unreliable as a measure) in a multi-CPU and/or > > hyperthreading > > environment. Can you clarify? > real >= (user + sys) * ncpu
umm, other way around of course. real * ncpu >= (user + sys) DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
