Rick C. Petty wrote:
"-l" may be a useful option, but at what point is the line drawn between bloating our base cp and having a gcp port (or using linux_base)??
It's like saying "if you need this option, go to Linux" - it just seems wrong.
With all respect to "series of small utilities" way of doing things, I think the "whatever is shorter to type" takes precedence :)
And it's not like the added code will have to be changed/maintained in the forseeable future - if the basic implementation is ok, the underlying structures and ideas will not change while UFS semantics are in use.
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
