Colin Percival wrote: > Generally speaking it's much better to add a new setuid program which does > exactly what you need, rather than making an existing and possibly insecure > program setuid.
Generally speaking I agree with you. To minimize the impact of having to run a different 'mount' executable (that I doubt desktop environments will likely do) it would be nice if 'mount' could automatically run 'usermount' if called by a regular user. -- Alex Dupre _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
