"Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for the feedback seems very strange that sshd was the first thing the > kernel killed off; so unless it was actually at fault ( would be very strange > ) > it would have been one of the smallest not largest processes. > The box has runs several 200M+ process and more 100M+ where > as sshd is usually 6M. > > So this leads me to the questions: > 1. Any know issues ssh which could make it eat memory? > 2. Is there possibly a bug with the "large process detection"?
There is no "large process detection". The first process that tries to fault in a new page after the system runs out of swap gets killed. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
