On Tue, 2005-Apr-12 05:24:15 -0700, ALeine wrote: > Having a flag to tag processes as vital to prevent them from getting >killed (or to give them lower next-to-be-killed priority so that all non-vital >processes get killed first) when you run out of swap would be a useful feature, >what do you guys think?
This has been discussed to death before - look in the archives for 'SIGDANGER' (probably pre-mailman). -- Peter Jeremy _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
